High-Fidelity Simulation in Nursing Education: A Narrative Review of Students’ Learning Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64397/nepj.v01i03.2026.a25Keywords:
debriefing, experiential learning, high-fidelity simulation, learning outcomesAbstract
Introduction: High-Fidelity Simulation (HFS) is a key pedagogical approach in nursing education, offering immersive and realistic clinical scenarios that help bridge the gap between theory and practice. Despite a growing body of research, evidence on nursing students’ learning outcomes with HFS remains fragmented across diverse study designs, educational contexts, and theoretical perspectives. Many studies emphasize isolated outcomes, such as knowledge acquisition or self-confidence, limiting integrative understanding across learning domains and constraining quantitative synthesis.
Aim: This narrative review synthesizes existing literature on nursing students’ learning outcomes with HFS, identifying recurring themes, perceptions, and educational outcomes across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning domains.
Methods: A narrative review was conducted of 23 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2024. Literature was retrieved from Google Scholar, PubMed, JSTOR, and ScienceDirect using the keywords “high fidelity,” “high-fidelity,” “nursing,” “teaching,” and “simulation.” Included studies employed qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods designs and involved nursing students. Studies focusing exclusively on educators, no available full-text, review articles, or non-English publications were excluded.
Results: The findings demonstrate that nursing students’ learning outcomes with HFS are multidimensional and consistently positive across varied educational and cultural contexts in three interrelated domains: (1) congnitive, (2) affective, and (3) psychomotor learning. Structured debriefing, experiential learning cycles, and effective faculty facilitation emerged as critical factors in optimizing learning outcomes. HFS consistently supported students’ development of knowledge, clinical reasoning, emotional readiness, and practical competence, reinforcing its value as a comprehensive pedagogical strategy in undergraduate nursing education.
Conclusion: HFS is a transformative educational strategy that integrates cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning that leads to enhancements of students’ competencies, confidence, and readiness for professional practice. Its curricular integration is a strategic educational approach that sets quality and standards, aligning to the complex demands of the contemporary nursing education with the aim to maximize positive impact to patient safety.
References
1. Abdulmohdi, N., & Mcvicar, A. (2023). Investigating the clinical decision-making of nursing students using high-fidelity simulation, observation and think aloud: A mixed methods research study. Journal of advanced nursing, 79(2), 811–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15507
2. Akalin, A., & Sahin, S. (2020). The impact of high-fidelity simulation on knowledge, critical thinking, and clinical decision-making for the management of pre-eclampsia. International Journal of Gynaecology And Obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 150(3), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13243
3. Alconero-Camarero, A. R., Sarabia Cobo, C. M., González-Gómez, S., Ibáñez-Rementería, I., & Alvarez-García, M. P. (2020). Descriptive study of the satisfaction of nursing degree students in high-fidelity clinical simulation practices. Estudio descriptivo de la satisfacción de los estudiantes del Grado en Enfermería en las prácticas de simulación clínica de alta fidelidad. Enfermeria clinica, 30(6), 404–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.07.007
4. Alshahrani, S. R. (2024). Nurse educators’ and students’ experiences of the integration of complex scenario-based, high-fidelity simulations within the 3rd and 4th years of the undergraduate nursing curriculum in Saudi Arabia [Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh]. http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/4396
5. Arrogante, O., Velarde García, J. F., Blázquez-González, P., & Moro-Tejedor, M. N. (2023). Great geriatric syndromes: Acquisition of nursing competencies and undergraduate nursing students' perceptions through high-fidelity simulation training. Nurse education today, 121, 105685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105685
6. Astbury, J., Ferguson, J., Silverthorne, J., Willis, S., & Schafheutle, E. (2021). High-fidelity simulation-based education in pre-registration healthcare programmes: a systematic review of reviews to inform collaborative and interprofessional best practice. Journal of interprofessional care, 35(4), 622-632.
7. Ayed, A., Khalaf, I. A., Fashafsheh, I., Saleh, A., Bawadi, H., Abuidhail, J., Thultheen, I., & Joudallah, H. (2022). Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Clinical Judgment Among Nursing Students. Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing, 59, 469580221081997. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580221081997
8. Ayed, A., Malak, M. Z., Al-amer, R. M., Batran, A., & Salameh, B. (2021). Effect of high fidelity simulation on perceptions of self-awareness, empathy, and patient-centered care among university pediatric nursing classes. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 56, 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.04.005
9. Blakeslee, J.R. (2020). Effects of high-fidelity simulation on the critical thinking skills of baccalaureate nursing students: A causal-comparative research study. Nurse Education Today, 92 (104494). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104494
10. Chow, K. M., Ahmat, R., Leung, A. W., & Chan, C. W. (2023). Is high-fidelity simulation-based training in emergency nursing effective in enhancing clinical decision-making skills? A mixed methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 69, Article 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103610
11. Coleman, D., & McLaughlin, D. (2019). Using simulated patients as a learning strategy to support undergraduate nurses to develop patient-teaching skills. British Journal of Nursing, 28(20), 1300–1306. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.20.1300
12. Daneshfar, M., Moonaghi, H.K. (2025). The impact of clinical simulation on bridging the theory–practice gap in nursing education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 25, Article 1216. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07790-8
13. Doğru, B. V., & Aydın, L. Z. (2020). The effects of training with simulation on knowledge, skill, and anxiety levels of nursing students in terms of cardiac auscultation: A randomized controlled study. Nurse Education Today, 84, Article 104216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104216
14. Filomeno, L., & Minciullo, A. (2021). High-fidelity simulation for the education of nursing students: A scoping review of the literature. Professioni Infermieristiche, 74(3), 183-189.
15. Gaspar, A. D., & Banayat, A. C. (2024). Undergraduate student nurses’ satisfaction, self-confidence, and perception of high-fidelity simulation-based learning on critically ill patients. Acta Medica Philippina, 58(12). https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v58i12.10240
16. Hanshaw, S.L. & Dickerson, S.S. (2020). High fidelity simulation evaluation studies in nursing education: A review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 46 (102818). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102818.
17. Ka Ling, F., Lim Binti Abdullah, K., Seng Chiew, G., Danaee, M., & Chan, C. M. H. (2021). The Impact of High-Fidelity Patient Simulation on the Level of Knowledge and Critical Thinking Skills in Code Blue Management Among Undergraduate Nursing Students in Malaysia. Sage Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211007123
18. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiental learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. http://carleton-wp-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/sites/313/2022/12/Experiential_Learning_Experience_As_The_Source_Of_-1.pdf
19. Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., and Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay Co. https://mason.gmu.edu/~ndabbagh/cehdclass/Resources/IDKB/krathstax.htm
20. Lei, Y. Y., Zhu, L., Sa, Y. T. R., & Cui, X. S. (2022). Effects of high-fidelity simulation teaching on nursing students' knowledge, professional skills and clinical ability: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Nurse education in practice, 60, 103306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103306
21. Meakim, C., Boese, T., Decker, S., Franklin, A., Gloe, D., Lioce, L., Sando, C., & Borum, J. (2013). Standards of best practice: Simulation standard I: Terminology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(6 Suppl.), S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.001
22. Mitchell, P., Wynia, M., Golden, R., McNellis, B., Okun, S., Webb, C. E., Rohrbach, V., & Von Kohorn, I. (2012). Core principles & values of effective team-based health care (Discussion paper). Institute of Medicine. https://www.iom.edu/tbc
23. Najjar, R. H., Lyman, B., & Miehl, N. (2015). Nursing students' experiences with high-fidelity simulation. International journal of nursing education scholarship, 12, /j/ijnes.2015.12.issue-1/ijnes-2015-0010/ijnes-2015-0010.xml. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2015-0010
24. Oermann, M. H., De Gagne, Jennie C., & Phillips, B. C. (2022). Teaching in nursing and role of the educator: The complete guide to best practice in teaching, evaluation, and curriculum development (3rd ed). Springer Publishing Company.
25. Plaza Del Pino, F. J., Arrogante, O., Simonelli-Muñoz, A. J., Gallego-Gómez, J. I., & Jiménez-Rodríguez, D. (2022). Use of high-fidelity clinical simulation for the development of cultural competence of nursing students. Nurse education today, 116, 105465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105465
26. Raman, S., Arulappan, J., Zaabi, O. A., Hashmi, I. A., Cyril Vincent, S., Raghavan, D., & Panchatcharam, S. (2024). Undergraduate Nursing Students' Attitude and Perception Toward High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Education in a Middle Eastern Country. SAGE open nursing, 10, 23779608241280836. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241280836
27. Reid, C. A., Ralph, J. L., El-Masri, M., & Ziefle, K. (2020). High-Fidelity Simulation and Clinical Judgment of Nursing Students in a Maternal-Newborn Course. Western journal of nursing research, 42(10), 829–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945920907395
28. Rossler, K.L. (2024). Exploring interprofessional education through a high-fidelity human patient simulation scenario: A mixed methods study. Dissertations. 1941.
29. Salameh, B., Ayed, A., Kassabry, M., & Lasater, K. (2021). Effects of a Complex Case Study and High-Fidelity Simulation on Mechanical Ventilation on Knowledge and Clinical Judgment of Undergraduate Nursing Students. Nurse educator, 46(4), E64–E69. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000938
30. Saritaş, E., Aydoğan, S., Tikit, Ö., Gülnar, E., Çalişkan, N., & Baykara, Z. G. (2024). The effect of simulation on auscultation skills, self-confidence, and anxiety levels in nursing students: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Education in Practice, Article 104016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104016
31. Sarkar, S., & Bhatia, G. (2021). Writing and appraising narrative reviews. Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research, 10(3), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcsr.jcsr_1_21
32. Schön, D.A. (1992). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
33. Sedgwick, M., Yanicki, S., Harder, N., & Scott, D. (2021). A scoping review of the integration of ethics education in undergraduate nursing high‐fidelity human simulation‐based learning. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(5-6), 605-614.
34. Stapleton-Corcoran, E. (2023). Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Center for the Advancement of Teaching Excellence, University of Illinois Chicago. https://teaching.uic.edu/blooms-taxonomy-of-educational-objectives/
35. Sterner, A., Sköld, R., & Andersson, H. (2023). Effects of Blended Simulation on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking Skills: A Quantitative Study. SAGE open nursing, 9, 23779608231177566. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231177566
36. Tonapa, S. I., Mulyadi, M., Ho, K. H. M., & Efendi, F. (2023). Effectiveness of using high-fidelity simulation on learning outcomes in undergraduate nursing education: systematic review and meta-analysis. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 27(2), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202301_31040
37. Tong, L. K., Li, Y. Y., Au, M. L., Wang, S. C., & Ng, W. I. (2022). Prebriefing for high-fidelity simulation in nursing education: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 119, 105609.
38. Toqan, D., Ayed, A., Khalaf, I. A., & Alsadi, M. (2023). Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Self-Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Among Nursing Students. SAGE open nursing, 9, 23779608231194403. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231194403
39. Watson, C., Gómez-Ibáñez, R., Granel, N., Bernabeu-Tamayo, M.D. (2021). Nursing students first experience on high fidelity simulation: A phenomenological research study. Nurse Education in Practice, 55 (103162). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103162
40. World Health Organization. (n.d.). Services organization and integration. WHO. Retrieved January 15, 2026, from https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/clinical-services-and-systems/service-organizations-and-integration
41. Zhang, H., Goh, S. H. L., Wu, X. V., Wang, W., & Mörelius, E. (2019). Prelicensure nursing students' perspectives on video-assisted debriefing following high fidelity simulation: A qualitative study. Nurse education today, 79, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-SA 4.0 allows:
- Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Rules to follow:
- Attribution (BY): You must give credit to the original creator, provide a link to the license, and note if changes were made.
- ShareAlike (SA): If you remix, change, or build upon the material, you must distribute your new work under the exact same CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
