Research Competency of Professional Nurses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64397/nepj.v02i01.2026.a08Keywords:
Research competency level, professional nurses, research problem definition, research methods, and procedures, data analysis and interpretation, research dissemination, research utilization, Hospital XAbstract
Introduction: Nurses face increasing demands for high-quality care, driven by local and global health advancements. This necessitates research and the adoption of evidence-based practices to enhance both nursing care and the profession itself. The literature reports the lack of understanding and accessibility of research related to the research capability of nurses. Collaborative nursing research across academic and practice settings is imperative to generate knowledge to improve patient care; however, models of academic/practice partnerships for nursing research are lacking.
Aim: This study determined the research competency of professional nurses to serve as a basis for the development of research-based activities.
Methods: Utilizing a quantitative descriptive survey design, with the use of a questionnaire and structured small group interview (4 small groups with 3-4 members per small group), data were gathered from 81 nurses employed at hospital X, which is a 250–bed capacity tertiary hospital. The self-made structured questionnaire is valid with a CVI=0.956. Frequency, percentage, mean, and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to treat the data statistically.
Results: Majority of the respondents belong to the younger population (87.66%) belonging to less than 2-5 years of service in the institution. Respondents are advanced nurse researchers (mean=1.95) and have been serving as respondents in research (50.00). The respondents had the highest mean =2.02 in problem identification and the lowest in research utilization with a mean=1.90. The research competency of nurses is significantly associated with educational attainment, with a p-value of 0.011. Position (p value=0.387), length of service (0.210), area of assignment (p value=0.449), and research involvement (p value=0.169) are not significantly associated with their research competency.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, the researchers conclude that nurses who are employed at Hospital X possess the knowledge; however, they lack the practical experience in research. The variable of educational attainment is an important factor in achieving research competency. There are personal, organizational, and professional facilitators and barriers to the research competency of the nurses. A research capability enhancement program for the nurses can be developed. The researchers recommend: enhancing the research competency of the nurses through a research capability-building program developed for them; strengthening the institutional support for ongoing research training, especially for the nurses who are pursuing their postgraduate education or continuing professional development in the research process; recognizing and rewarding research engagement and output among nursing staff to sustain high-level performance; the promotion of mentoring systems where expert and proficient nurses can guide those still developing their research competencies, and the conduct of future studies involving multiple institutions to broaden generalizability and include more inferential analysis.
References
Aloweni, F., Teh, A. H., Tan, S. B., & Ang, S. Y. (2017). Promoting research competence: Introduction of the nursing research immersion program in Singapore General Hospital. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare, 26(4), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105817697734
Buhaid, N., Lau, R., & O’Connor, M. (2014). A survey of nurses’ perceived barriers to research utilization in Bahrain in comparison to other countries. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University. https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/a-survey-of-nurse-perceived-barriers-to-research-utilization-in-
Chien, C. H. (2020). Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Nursing Research. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31971305/
Feliciano, A., Feliciano, E., Russel, J., Fernandez, Z., Carl, P., Fink, R. T., Thompson, C., & Bonnes, D. (2005). Overcoming barriers and promoting use of research in practice. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 35(3), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200503000-00005
Hu, H., Yu, X., Tang, Z., & Lin, L. (2019). Research capacity and research training needs of clinical nurses in Suzhou, China. Continuing Education in Nursing, 50(9), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20190814-09
Jacobson, A. F., Warner, A. M., Fleming, E., & Schmidt, B. (2008). Factors influencing nurses’ participation in clinical research. Applied Nursing Research, 31, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SGA.0000324112.63532.a2
Lode, K., Sørensen, E., Salmela, S., Holm, A. L., & Severinsson, E. (2015). Clinical nurses’ research capacity building in practice: A systematic review. Open Journal of Nursing, 5, 664–677. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2015.57070
Moe, A., & Enmarker, I. (2020). Research utilization in municipality nursing practice in rural districts in Norway: A cross-sectional quantitative questionnaire study. BMC Nursing, 19, Article 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00475-1
Parahoo, K. (2007). Barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization among nurses in Northern Ireland. Implementation Science, 2, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-17
Purkis, J., Jackson, J. A., Hundt, G., & Stockman, C. (2008). Increasing nursing research capacity in the workplace. Nursing Times, 104(37), 28–31.
Squires, J. E., Moralejo, D., & Lefort, S. M. (2015). Exploring the role of organizational policies and procedures in promoting research utilization in registered nurses. Open Journal of Nursing, 5, 664–677. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojn
Wangensteen, S., Johansson, I. S., Björkström, M. E., & Nordström, G. (2012). Newly graduated nurses’ perception of competence and possible predictors: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28(3), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.11.014
Zhang, J., Yan, Q., & Yue, S. (2020). Nursing research and its management in China: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management, 28, 199–208.
Blake, N. (2016). Yes, nurses do research, and it’s improving patient care. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/yes-nurses-do-research-and-it-is-improving-patient-care
Franks-Meeks, S. (2020). Participation in nursing research: We can do better. Nursing, 50(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000651812.87874.cb
Statistics Solutions. (2020, October 22). Dissertation and research consulting for statistical analysis. https://www.statisticssolutions.com/
Dissertation / Other Online Sources
Sande, M. J. B. (n.d.). Competencies of nurses in Albay: An assessment. Bicol University R&D Journal. https://journal.bicol-u.edu.ph/index.php/rnd/article/view/12
O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Yoder, L. (2017). Medical-surgical nurses’ participation in nursing research. MEDSURG Nursing, 26(3). Jannetti Publications, Inc.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-SA 4.0 allows:
- Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Rules to follow:
- Attribution (BY): You must give credit to the original creator, provide a link to the license, and note if changes were made.
- ShareAlike (SA): If you remix, change, or build upon the material, you must distribute your new work under the exact same CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
